Your Cart

Statutory Illegality and Restraint of Trade Agreements

Statutory Illegality and Restraint of Trade Agreements: What You Need to Know

In the world of business, it is not uncommon for companies to enter into agreements that limit competition or trade. However, some of these agreements, known as restraint of trade agreements, may be considered unlawful under certain circumstances.

Restraint of trade agreements, also known as non-competition agreements, are contractual agreements between two parties that limit one party`s ability to compete with the other party`s business. These agreements are typically used to protect a company`s trade secrets, confidential information, or customer relationships.

In the United States, restraint of trade agreements are subject to antitrust laws, which are designed to promote competition and prevent monopolies. The Sherman Antitrust Act, passed in 1890, prohibits contracts, combinations, and conspiracies that restrain trade.

Under antitrust laws, restraint of trade agreements are only lawful if they are reasonable and necessary to protect legitimate business interests. For example, a non-competition agreement that restricts an employee from working for a competitor for a limited time and within a specific geographic area may be considered reasonable if it is necessary to protect the employer`s trade secrets or confidential information.

However, if a restraint of trade agreement is too broad, too long, or not necessary to protect legitimate business interests, it may be considered an unreasonable restraint of trade and, therefore, illegal under antitrust laws.

One type of restraint of trade agreement that is specifically prohibited under antitrust laws is price-fixing agreements. Price-fixing agreements occur when two or more parties agree to set prices for goods or services, which eliminates competition and can result in higher prices for consumers.

If a restraint of trade agreement is found to be illegal under antitrust laws, the parties involved may be subject to significant fines and other penalties. Additionally, the agreement may be deemed void, meaning that the parties cannot enforce its terms.

In conclusion, restraint of trade agreements can be a useful tool for companies to protect their legitimate business interests. However, it is important to ensure that these agreements comply with antitrust laws and are not too broad, too long, or unnecessary. As a professional, it is crucial to understand these concepts and ensure that any content related to restraint of trade agreements is accurate and informative for readers.